Assessment CommitteeChairs: Heidi Broad-Smith, Jan Greico Members: Charge: The charge of this committee is to develop and implement a comprehensive assessment plan for determining institutional effectiveness. The committee will examine existing assessment practices and strategies, and will explore, propose, implement and analyze new ones. A primary function of this committee is to communicate ongoing and proposed assessment activities to the campus community
Minutes:
FIVE YEAR CYCLE FOR PROGRAM AND INSTITUTIONAL ASSESSMENT Year 1 (2008-2009) · Research and examine various internal assessment methods to evaluate program and institutional effectiveness. · Educate Assessment Committee members on process, analysis and outcomes of internal assessment. · Collect and correlate Mission Statements from all programs and departments. · Narrative report written Year 2 (2009-2010) Write a Davis Family Foundation grant for assessment costs. · Map curriculum (courses) to program outcomes for three programs: Arts and Sciences (which will incorporate assessment of the General Education Core), Precision Metals, and Accounting Information Systems. · Evaluate outcomes and course alignment · Develop rubrics for competency levels for all courses in the three programs above. (Three levels: introduction, reinforcement, competency) · Develop common assessment tools for each program to measure student competency. Identify artifacts to be collected and evaluation schedule. · Collect random samples of 20% of students for each course. · Map and align program outcomes to institutional mission, outcomes and definition of an educated person. · Analyze assessment data against Bloom’s taxonomy which most New England institutions are using as a benchmark for educational effectiveness. · Produce assessment summary report for the entire college, including findings of assessment, and a recommended action plan for Year Three, built on the results of Year Two findings. Year 3 (2010-2011 · Present previous year’s work and Year Three action plan to the entire college community. · Continue Curriculum Mapping (courses) to program outcomes for remaining programs, evaluating outcomes and course alignment. · Select three programs per semester to evaluate. · Develop rubrics for competency levels for all courses in the three programs above. (Three levels: introduction, reinforcement, competency) · Develop common assignment tools for each program to measure student competency. Identify artifacts to be collected and evaluation schedule. · Collect random samples of 20% of students for each course. · Map and align program outcomes to institutional mission, outcomes and definition of an educated person. · Analyze assessment data against Bloom’s taxonomy which most New England institutions are using as a benchmark for educational effectiveness. · Produce assessment summary report for the entire college, including findings of assessment, and a recommended action plan for Year Four, built on the results of Year Three findings. Year 4 2011-2012 · Present previous year’s work and Year Four action plan to the entire college community. · Select three programs per semester to evaluate. · Develop rubrics for competency levels for all courses in the three programs above. (Three levels: introduction, reinforcement, competency) · Develop common assignment tools for each program to measure student competency. Identify artifacts to be collected and evaluation schedule. · Collect random samples of 20% of students for each course. · Map and align program outcomes to institutional mission, outcomes and definition of an educated person. · Analyze assessment data against Bloom’s taxonomy which most New England institutions are using as a benchmark for educational effectiveness. · Produce assessment summary report for the entire college, including findings of assessment, and a recommended action plan for Year Five, built on the results of Year Four findings. Year 5 2012-2013 · Present previous year’s work and Year Five action plan to the entire college community. · Select three programs per semester to evaluate. · Develop rubrics for competency levels for all courses in the three programs above. (Three levels: introduction, reinforcement, competency) · Develop common assignment tools for each program to measure student competency. Identify artifacts to be collected and evaluation schedule. · Collect random samples of 20% of students for each course. · Map and align program outcomes to institutional mission, outcomes and definition of an educated person. · Analyze assessment data against Bloom’s taxonomy which most New England institutions are using as a benchmark for educational effectiveness. · Produce assessment summary report for the entire college, including findings of assessment, and a recommended action plan for Year Five, built on the results of Year Four findings. · Full assessment and review of previous actions. Analyze and fine-tune previous years work, and establish schedule and activities for next five-year cycle. Last changed: Apr 07 2010 at 10:51 AM Back |