Standard Five: Faculty
Description
A properly prepared and dedicated faculty is a major factor in the achievement of the mission of the college. Currently 44 full-time and
19 adjunct faculty provide the necessary classroom, laboratory and on-site learning experiences for students. Faculty members are chosen
for their technical training/experience and/or academic preparation to ensure that students are receiving the best possible learning experience. Raising the level of faculty credentials has been a major
focus for several years and includes increased credential requirements for new hires and professional development support for tenured faculty. A five-year Title III Strengthening Institutions Grant (1989-1994) resulted in four faculty receiving the doctorate, 17 received a master?s degree and several began work toward a baccalaureate degree. Since that initial focus on upgrading credentials, several faculty have completed the baccalaureate degree and four have completed their master?s requirements.
Faculty qualifications are established to ensure that they possess the requisite academic and technical knowledge to successfully carry out teaching assignments. Preparation for teaching assignments is
determined to be appropriate when faculty possess the occupational and/or academic skills needed to successfully facilitate the learning process. Academic and/or occupational experience credentials are utilized as indicators of requisite knowledge and skill to be successful in a particular teaching assignment. A master's degree in the
discipline is preferred. Professional experience and success as a
practitioner are also factors that support preparation of faculty for teaching assessments. Professional accreditation standards as well as regional standards are used to ensure faculty members are qualified for their assignments.
Faculty performance is assessed through student input and formal evaluation in accordance with the collective bargaining agreements. In addition to faculty performance, program reviews are conducted on a five-year cycle to ensure programs meet their assigned objectives. Sufficient faculty members are employed by the college to meet the demand placed upon its academic programs. This number is determined by ensuring that teaching assignments are consistent with the workload stipulated in the faculty contract as well as student to faculty ratios required by professional accrediting organizations. The duties and responsibilities of the faculty are also considered when determining the number of faculty required (See Faculty & Staff Handbook, "The Work of the Faculty at NMTC," and Maine Technical College System Board of Trustees Agreement with the Maine Education Association Faculty Unit Contract, Article 27, Section B, in the workroom). In addition, faculty
are also consulted to ensure that the number of faculty employed are sufficient to meet the demand and needs of students.
MTCS and NMTC policies and procedures guide the recruiting and hiring of all faculty members. These processes are also outlined in the faculty contract. All applicants for faculty positions receive a copy of the faculty contract and are given opportunities to review and discuss its contents with members of the selection committee. The college adheres
to all MTCS and institutional human resources policies for the hiring of support staff for the instructional areas. The policies are included in the MTCS Policy Manual and in the NMTC Faculty & Staff Handbook. The college adheres to the collective bargaining agreement language that applies to the hiring of administrators, faculty and staff and complies with Equal Opportunity Employment requirements.
Professional development is available to all employees of the college and is funded by grant funds and funds from the general campus budget. The current benchmark for professional development funding is two percent of the campus education and general fund budget. To be eligible for funding assistance, faculty and staff are required to submit annual professional development plans which list activities supporting professional growth. These annual plans are designed to support the
college's strategic plan and the strategic plan of the MTCS. Requests for funding for professional development activities are reviewed by department chairs and then presented to the college's professional development committee, which is made up of representatives of every area of the college. The committee reviews the individual's request compared
to the goals of the college. If approved, the request is forwarded to the vice president for final approval. Each staff member receiving
funding support must provide a report of how the experience was used to enhance the learning environment and/or to further the caliber of services offered by the individual. If the funding is provided by the
Perkins-funded professional development activity, the written report must address a number of factors to indicate how the activity furthers the goal of the Perkins project.
The college does not employ graduate-teaching assistants. However, in some technical areas of the college, student interns and laboratory technicians are used to support faculty members. Prospective interns
complete an application process and are selected following discussions with faculty, department chairs and the academic dean.
Faculty assignments are established in consultation with department chairs and faculty regarding the proposed draft academic schedule prior to the next semester. Assignments are made in accordance with the collective bargaining agreement. Workloads for faculty are re-appraised
each semester and more frequently if faculty request a review or change. Consideration is given to faculty members who are completing special projects for the college or the system. This may result in a change of assignment if mutually agreed upon by faculty and management. Faculty contractual security, salary and benefits are set via the collective bargaining process at the system level. The campus maintains a faculty labor management committee to address concerns that may arise. The responsibilities of faculty are defined in the faculty contract and in the document titled "The Work of the Faculty at NMTC" (workroom document). The faculty accepted this document in 1995. Policies and procedures for recruitment, appointments, evaluation and promotion can also be found in the MTCS Policy and Procedures Manual. The procedures for faculty appointments are described in the faculty contract. The faculty evaluation process includes gathering feedback from students, in the form of a student opinion questionnaire, as well as classroom evaluation by the department chair. The progress of faculty is not tied to performance in the classroom.
The faculty contract protects academic freedom and supports faculty in their effort to provide open and honest dialogue in the learning environment. The college adopted a Philosophy of Ethical Practices in 1989. That philosophical statement is in effect today and serves as a guide for the action of all employees. The professionally accredited programs in the business technology department have adopted the ethical practice statement of the Association of Collegiate Business Schools and Programs. The nursing department has also adopted the appropriate ethical practice statement for its profession.
Appraisal
The college's recent history shows significant effort has been and continues to be focused on the strengthening of faculty qualifications. This has been done in accordance with the desire of the NMTC strategic plan goal 1: "Enhance the quality of programs and services through on-going institutional accreditation, professional program accreditations and/or program certifications.? With the support of
release time, financial support and reduced teaching loads, the college's faculty have completed several undergraduate, masters and doctoral degrees.
The changes in recruiting practices and professional development support for faculty have moved the college forward. The alignment of
professional development activities of the faculty with assessment and achievement of personal, professional and college goals should continue to ensure that the professional development of faculty has a direct impact on teaching and learning. This will require the strengthening of the faculty evaluation process to ensure that it provides meaningful feedback for faculty and results in goals for faculty that are supported by the college. The criteria used to evaluate faculty address some portions of the mission of the college; however, they are not sufficiently broad to provide feedback for faculty in all areas. The faculty evaluation process is set by the collective bargaining agreement, but the college, through its faculty management committee, can make adjustments to localize the process. With a primary focus on
assisting faculty to strengthen their teaching and learning, this process will enable the college to improve its ability to achieve its mission.
The hiring of new faculty has seen the college expand its recruiting practices to include advertising in national publications and requiring a master?s degree in the discipline for most faculty positions. Even though applicants for technical positions often do not have the combination of experience and academic credential desired, the college continues to make progress in this area.
For newly hired technical faculty who lack background or experience in teaching, the college provides an informal mentoring experience to facilitate the adjustment to teaching and managing their area. This process is lacking in any formal support structure for new faculty members with little or no teaching experience. The college needs to
improve the processes in place to support the development of teaching skills for new faculty members lacking teaching experience. The current number of faculty is sufficient to meet the needs of students; however, the non-teaching duties of faculty continue to grow with little or no added support. The college pays a stipend ($750) to
faculty who transition a course to on-line status. Faculty involvement in admission counseling and recruiting, academic advising and program advisory committee activities continues to expand the expectations for faculty with little support in place for these services. The college needs to assess the roles and responsibilities of faculty in providing support services, evaluate the role of student affairs, and develop clear lines of responsibility to ensure that expectations are clear and that resources are allocated to provide the support faculty need to deliver instruction.
The college's policies and procedures for recruiting and appointing of new faculty are clear and ensure that faculty are involved in the process. The committee structure of the college affords faculty the opportunity to participate in the decision making process. The college's faculty/management committee, composed of faculty and management members, provides a forum for faculty to raise concerns and to address concerns that do not get resolved in other forums with management.
The institution's future is dependent on the success of its graduates and strong programs. Full-time faculty members are the core foundation
upon which this success rests. Much discussion has occurred relative to
the financial benefit of increasing the number of adjunct faculty. The college has made the decision not to change the commitment to the use of full-time faculty. The current faculty contract gives full-time faculty
the right of first refusal for teaching courses above the workload requirement. This assures that full-time faculty have the opportunity to teach all courses that are in their area of expertise. While this is a strength in many ways, it also is a weakness. Full-time faculty
members are compensated for teaching overloads based on a formula established by the faculty/ management committee. This agreement puts
no limits on the number of hours a full-time faculty member may teach nor does it deal with the number of students a faculty member may teach in any given semester. This, combined with a retirement system that
encourages faculty to increase their teaching load late in their career to increase annual retirement earnings, creates a situation where some faculty choose to assume very heavy teaching loads in order to increase the contribution towards their retirement. The college needs to address
the issues associated with the amount of teaching load full-time faculty members are permitted to undertake. Addressing this issue will ensure
that faculty members have the time and resources to meet the needs of students and eliminate the pressure to carry extra courses. The college strives to ensure that part-time faculty members have the information and materials needed to follow the department-approved course syllabus of the courses being taught by the full-time faculty. Processes are in place to provide limited support for these faculty members. The college can strengthen the adjunct faculty positions by addressing the needs of adjunct faculty in the same manner as full-time faculty. Contact between full-time and adjunct faculty is limited, and adjunct faculty have little access to the professional development resources of the college. Limited office space and evaluation provides
little opportunity for feedback for adjunct faculty who are looking to improve teaching skills or to expand their knowledge in a particular area. Support services for adjunct faculty members are not consistent with what is available for full-time faculty. Communication with
adjunct faculty is limited, and their participation in college decisions is limited. It is important for all faculty members to understand the mission of the college and the goals outlined in the strategic plan. The college would benefit from strengthening the support processes and procedures for adjunct faculty members and in working to include these faculty members in the campus community. The responsibilities of
adjunct faculty are not clearly defined. The college could strengthen
its academic area by putting into place a formal document that describes the duties and responsibilities of adjunct faculty. These
responsibilities should be reflected in the contractual agreements between adjunct faculty and the college.
Projections
In order to make the most of its institutional effectiveness efforts, it is essential that the college align its faculty professional development efforts with its strategic plan and institutional effectiveness efforts. Several issues need to be addressed to ensure this is accomplished.
First, the college's faculty/management team to needs assess the faculty evaluation process. This committee has been established to provide the
campus faculty and management with a vehicle from which to implement change. The committee needs to work to ensure that faculty evaluation is aligned with the professional development goals for faculty and the strategic planning goals of the institution.
The continued improvement of teaching/learning practices warrants greater attention in this process. It is the primary responsibility of
faculty to provide quality learning opportunities for students. Assessing the outcomes of the instructional process will assist faculty in determining their effectiveness and will provide guidance for additional professional development activities to help expand knowledge and skills utilized in the learning environment.
The collective bargaining agreement provides little incentive for assessment of teaching or professional development. The college must
ensure that faculty have the necessary opportunities to continually improve their effectiveness. The evaluation process should be one of
the foundation pieces for planning professional development activities. When possible, faculty are hired who have prior teaching experience or training; however, this in not always not possible. The development and
implementation of a formal process to enhance the teaching effectiveness of faculty having no prior teaching experience or training is essential for the continued improvement of instruction. Several experienced
faculty have the expertise and training to address this need. It may be necessary to provide sufficient release time for those interested to develop a series of seminars, courses, or mentoring processes to meet this need.
Due to the fact that the number of faculty needed from one semester to the next fluctuates with enrollment, there will be a continued need for qualified adjunct faculty. Several issues involving adjunct faculty
need to be addressed.
The college must ensure that all courses, whether taught by full-time faculty or adjunct, contain the same performance and assessment standards. Establishing better communication processes and professional
development opportunities will be a continuing challenge. The professional development committee may be an appropriate vehicle to address these issues. Orientation for adjunct faculty should be more consistently applied and include not only administrative policies and procedures but also
discussion of institutional mission and goals, the goals of the program, course or courses to be taught and the college's definition of an educated person. Other adjunct faculty support issues to be addressed
include compensation, office support, information services, professional development, and enhanced communication. The academic dean and
department chairs working with the faculty/ management team should collaborate to address these issues.
The institution has begun the process of offering on-line learning experiences for some students. Faculty are becoming increasingly
involved as the college provides the opportunity for training and experimentation in on-line delivery techniques. As the development and
delivery of on-line courses grows, the college will need to set standards for course development and delivery and assess the effectiveness of the on-line delivery process. The institution's
curriculum committee may be the vehicle to addresses issues related to on-line delivery of courses.
At this time, faculty compensation for development and delivery of on-line courses is not clear and needs clarification. This will necessitate a review of the institution's definition of an acceptable teaching load. Available support systems for students and faculty will
need to be reviewed to ensure all needs unique to this teaching environment are met. This has implications for all support services of
the college.
|